México Unique
by John Wasson john wasson
How was Mexico different?
Mexico was different and is still different in more ways than can
quickly be told.
To begin, Style:
If you fell out of the sky over Mexico, before you hit the ground,
you
would know what country you were in. Every area had its dress and its
pottery and its toys and if you had been around you not only
would know
that you were in Mexico you would know what part of Mexico. That
is not the case anywhere south of Guatemala. South of Guatemala you would
be hard put to quickly recognize if the country you landed in was Honduras
or Panama or Colombia or Ecuador (unless you landed in Otavalo), let
alone what district you were in. This Mexican sense of style penetrates
everyone and often converts them. Diego Rivera was a Mexican but he
went to Paris to study art and he became a fine painter, a recognized Cubist,
he returned to Mexico and became one of the great painters of this century
working in a style that was totally Mexican, to the point that
you could hardly see the influence of Cubism even if you looked for
it.
At the same time there were half a dozen other painters and Muralists
approaching his quality and most of them had never been to Paris. This
uniqueness was in art and music. The Mariachis where not just a
superficial fad popular among intellectuals, they were and are a vital
part of the culture instantly recognizable. Where else is the Day of
the
Dead quite like the Day of the Dead in Mexico. Where else do they make
Skulls of sugar with your name on them and sell them in bakeries on
the
Day of the Dead. Where else have they created an artist like Frieda
Kahlo.
Pride:
I know of no other country in this hemisphere where true and
honest
nationalism was so powerful. During my first year in Mexico I never
heard a Mexican criticize Mexico in front of a foreigner (this changed
during the Olympics). The Pride was not simply in ones country but
it
was also pride in ones village and ones local history. One comparison,
a
Somosa wife in Nicaragua a first a cousin of her husband and
she was
also an American Citizen. During an election campaign she was asked
if
she was planning to vote for her husband and she replied no, because
if
she voted she might lose her American Citizenship. Anyone who was in
Mexico when I was there would know what an explosion of outrage that
would have caused if a Mexican politicians wife had said such a thing.
But let me continue: There is no comparable monument in this hemisphere
to the National Museum of Anthropology in Mexico and no collection
of
such a size with such a uniform level of artistic quality in
any other
country. There is no other entrance, to my knowledge, to any Museum
with a huge lintel having written on it "Mexican enter here and see
the
greatness of your past, Foreigner enter here and see the greatness
of
the History of Mexico. (That is a crude approximation of what is written
but the meaning is accurate) there is no other university quite like
the
National University of Mexico as a monument to an intellectual history.
Abuse:
Much about Mexico is not pretty, there is a tradition of abuse of
government power, there is a tradition of the Government officials
living off of bribes or mordidas or direct service fees, and there
is a
lesser known tradition of police brutality that approaches the worst
in
the hemisphere. There was not a tradition of assassination as an
instrument of government policy, expulsion yes, but assassination no,
Never the less, for a Mexican to get jailed was for him to have his
life
threatened. But few went to jail, except for political reasons, unless
the crime was serious and the criminal broke. When I was in Mexico
there was a feeling that the Aztecs were still in power with a six-year
absolute monarch chosen in a totally impenetrable fashion, and a
military that was never mentioned in public.
The Epiphanies:
Linda Schele has many times mentioned the profundity of Mexico's effect
on her. Sam Edgerton has written about his epiphany on his visit to
Monte Alban. John Carr has written elegies to his stay in Oaxaca. I
have mentioned what my first visit to Chichenitza and Villahermosa did
to me. I know there are people who have been a deeply affected by the ruins
in South America, particularly Machu Pichu but I don't believe any other
country has had the power to affect people as deeply as Mexico has affected
the people I have mentioned and a large lot of others.
The Food:
Mexican food has been listed with Chinese and French as the greatest
culinary traditions. I am not talking about the #1 plate in a northern
border-style cafe nor am I talking about places, no, palaces, like
San
Angel Inn in Mexico City. But I am talking about the infinite variety
of
complex sauces, sauces which have the same name in many places but
like
french wines or cheeses no two preparations are exactly the same. I
mean
the many varieties of Mole, only one of which is the world famous Mole
Poblano. I mean the Pipian sauces and the Nogado sauces and the family
of Adobo sauces and the various Adobados. I am talking about the Guisos
and the Carne Guisados. Mexican sauces like Indian curries and some
French sauces take more than a day to make what with charring and
grinding and peeling and steaming until everything is ready to go
together. I had a mole in Oaxaca, not too long ago, that among dozens
of
ingredients had charred avocado skin as a minor component. In the market
where they sold that Mole they had one stall with twenty varieties of
dried chilies and they had a young lady and her mother selling Quesadillas,
a large tortilla folded over with a local white cheese and pumpkin blossoms
inside, heated until the cheese was melted. With all of this I haven't
even mentioned the seafood stews and the seviches.
When Mexico city has begun to look like the twin of Los Angeles and
all
the people in the markets are dressed in blue jeans and tee shirts
and
all the young men are wearing tennis shoes endorsed by Michael Jordan
or his successor those sauces will still be there and the tourists both
foreign and national will be going on guided cuisine trecks searching for
the perfect Pipian and the smoothest Mole.
The changes:
The changes in Mexico are the changes taking place all over the
world
and I suspect they are the changes that must be made if a country is
to
have a modern industrial economy and move to the next (and more fragile)
level of capacity to sustain a larger population. Please remember, I am
fairly long in the tooth and perhaps because of this I am saying change
not progress. With all of the changes however, I expect that there
will
still be the style, the pride, the food and probably the corruption
and
one hopes that forever there will be retained that power to transform
whoever gets close. Monte Alban is not going away, Santo Domingo in
Qaxaca is not going away, and the sense of style which started with
the
Olmecs is not going away.
*****
|